Issaquah City Hall. File photo

Issaquah City Hall. File photo

Issaquah city council adopts final 2020 budget

Revised budget passes six to one.

The Issaquah City Council adopted the final 2020 budget at its Nov. 18 meeting after months of deliberation.

In September, Mayor Mary Lou Pauly’s proposed 2020 budget forecasted a shortfall of $5.2 million dollars, and it suggested various tax increases and city service cuts in order to balance. The council discussed at length how to bridge the gap during six budget study sessions in October and November.

After deliberations and council revisions, the final 2020 budget outlines $143.1 million in expenditures, including $49.8 million of general fund expenses. Projected revenues for the budget total $133.7 million. An overall resulting decrease in fund balance of $9,402,861 is expected.

In total, the budget for all city funds is down $1.8 million from the adopted 2019 budget of $144.9 million and the general fund is down $3.2 million from the 2019 budget.

Ultimately the council decided on several changes, including lowering the proposed utility tax rate increase from 6 percent to 3 percent. They also lowered the proposed increase on Senior Gold Pass cost from $120 per year to $60 per year for residents and from $144 to $72 per year for non-residents. They also restored funding to maintain the community center and swimming pool hours of operation at the 2019 level.

The adopted budget restores funds for community grants and contracts for service. It also adds funding that supports integrating Strategic Plan environmental objectives into work on Title 18, the city’s land use code. Additionally, it will draw $196,211 of fund balance to support a City Service Assessment.

The council also has asked the administration to look into several policy priorities in 2020, including developing an assistance program to help low-income residents with the impacts of increased taxes and fees.

The adopted full 2020 budget can be read on the city’s website. (

Council members thanked the staff for their work on the budget, acknowledging the difficulties throughout the process.

“I really appreciate the team that worked on this, particularly the finance department,” Councilmember Stacy Goodman said. “In my personal opinion this was the best presented proposed budget that I have ever seen.”

Councilmember Tola Marts echoed that sentiment.

“This has been, going into it, one of the most challenging budgets that we’ve had in my ten years on council. But, owing to superb presentation and support from city staff and off of deliberation on the part of council we have arrived at a solution,” he said.

“We have some big challenges in front of us next year,” he added.

Councilmember Paul Winterstein voted against the budget, which passed six to one.

“If I could have it my way, we wouldn’t have raised the taxes, we would have reduced spending even more, and we would have temporarily used fund balance,” he said. He asked that the council commit to reviewing utility taxes next year and consider resetting the utility taxes to their pre-2020 levels.

“I respect the process. I’m one of seven. And I’m as proud of my city as I have ever been,” he said.

While the budget’s total expenses exceed total revenues by more than $9 million, finance director Beth Goldberg said that difference is technically not a deficit because the budget is fund based and the city will spend money from its various dedicated funds.

Each of the dedicated funds has a substantial balance, and Goldberg said it is normal to draw from those funds and they should be investing some of them. Each fund is earmarked specifically for certain types of expenses and can only be spent in certain ways.

For example, the bulk of the spending to cover the $9 million dollar difference will come from the enterprise fund. That fund is comprised of the money from the city’s water, sewer and stormwater utilities. That money can only be spent on utilities.

The enterprise fund will have a 2020 starting balance of $29.3 million. Then the anticipated revenue from utilities in 2020 is $32.5 million and the expenditures related to utilities total $36.3 million. So, there is an expected difference and overall draw from the enterprise fund of $3.8 million. The ending balance is estimated to be $25.4 million.

The bulk of city services are paid for by the city’s general fund, which is expected to decrease from a starting balance of about $13.7 million to an ending balance of $13.4 million, a difference and draw of $196,211. That difference is created by an anticipated $49.8 million in expenditures but only a $49.7 million in general fund revenues.

Goldberg said the previously discussed general fund deficit of $5.2 million in the proposed budget was closed with new revenues and reductions.

In consideration of how we voice our opinions in the modern world, we’ve closed comments on our websites. We value the opinions of our readers and we encourage you to keep the conversation going.

Please feel free to share your story tips by emailing

To share your opinion for publication, submit a letter through our website Include your name, address and daytime phone number. (We’ll only publish your name and hometown.) We reserve the right to edit letters, but if you keep yours to 300 words or less, we won’t ask you to shorten it.

More in News

First WA state prisoner tests positive for COVID-19

The man is the first person in Washington to contract the disease while in a state prison.

Students will not return to classrooms this school year

Monday’s decision applies to all schools — public, private and charter.

Drive-thru COVID-19 virus testing last week in the parking lot near Everett Memorial Stadium in Everett. A study by the University of Washington and UnitedHealth Group, conducted at Everett Clinic locations, found that a less-intrusive form of the coronavirus test would require fewer precautions by health care workers. (Andy Bronson / The Herald)
New self-swab COVID-19 test is just as accurate, study finds

The study, under peer review, was led by an Everett Clinic doctor. It could speed up testing nationwide.

Life Care Center (LCC) of Kirkland is facing more than $600,000 in fines for its response to the COVID-19 outbreak in its facility. Samantha Pak/Sound Publishing
Life Care in Kirkland facing more than $600K in fines for COVID-19 response

The facility has until Sept. 16 to pay or address areas of concern or it will be terminated.

Dentist checking patient’s teeth. Sound Publishing file photo
Dental foundation serves Medicaid patients through COVID-19

The Arcora Foundation is also attempting to expand its urgent care database, allowing those with different insurances to use its services during the outbreak.

Gov. Jay Inslee during a press conference April 2, 2020. (Photo courtesy of Gov. Inslee’s Facebook page)
Gov. Inslee extends stay-home order to May 4

As in other states, demand for intensive health care due to COVID-19 is expected to peak later in April.

Unemployment claims continue to climb

For the week of March 22-28, claims have reached more than 181,000.

Inslee to state businesses: Pivot to make medical equipment

The governor said Wednesday that the state must become self-reliant in the fight against COVID-19.

Most Read