Street cameras a useful tool in law enforcement | Editorial

The two bombs that killed three people and injured scores of others at the Boston Marathon remind us that there is no easy way to prevent the evil of terrorism. However, we can make the task of finding those responsible easier.

 

The two bombs that killed three people and injured scores of others at the Boston Marathon remind us that there is no easy way to prevent the evil of terrorism. However, we can make the task of finding those responsible easier.

Unfortunately, we often make it unnecessarily difficult for law enforcement agencies to do their jobs. A case in point is the issue in Seattle over cameras at the Port of Seattle.

There’s no argument that the cameras can help the Port better police those critical facilities. Ports not only are targets for terrorism, but also for smuggling.

The situation in Seattle is that the cameras can swivel, allowing them to point to – and observe – Seattle streets. Some see this as making it easier for Big Brother to spy on people.

In reality, cameras already are a part of our lives. They record us at cash machines. Video surveillance signs dot countless shops and stores. A number of traffic intersections have speed or red-light cameras.

Some call London the most camera saturated city in the world, due, of course, to the “troubles” that plagued it for years over issues in Ireland. They’ve proven how they can help track and catch.

Yes, street cameras need regulations on who can view images and how they will be used, but proper penalties can prevent abuse.

Boston shows that we’re all vulnerable to attack. Cameras are a proven way to help catch those responsible.

 

Speaking of ‘terrorists’…

In a column last week, I mentioned that I had inherited an automatic pistol from my father. Yikes! Well, no, it isn’t automatic. Blame a brain-freeze on deadline.

 

– Craig Groshart, Issaquah & Sammamish Reporter